Tackling the controversy that surrounds interrogation tactics, Standard Operating Procedure provides a small glimpse into the minds and souls of those who were on the front lines at the Abu Ghraib prison. Whether coping with the inhumane actions or finding the actions humorous and enjoyable, the soldiers within the confines of the prison ignored the law and took photographs of the numerous prisoners that called Abu Ghraib home. Months later, when the pictures surfaced, an outcry was heard from around the world. That outcry did more than force our country's leader to publically apologize to the world, it created a question that will forever rest in the back of every person's mind: Is America just a guilty of war terrorism as the countries in which they are fighting?
Told through the words and eyes of those within the prison walls, Standard Operating Procedure provides a very personnel and often disturbing telling. However, as the film progressed and reached the halfway point, I found myself turned off, not by the actions of those responsible, but by the way in which they spoke about what they did.
At one point during the latter half of the film, a woman, Lynndie England, tells what she did with a smile and then a slight chuckle. Her face shows no signs of remorse or even compassion to those who have suffered as a result. Yet, even when told that her acts against humanity were illegal, she shrugged and said that she was in love. Actions speak louder than words and for England, her actions spoke volumes. It is unfortunate that her nonverbal actions helped to build and cement in a wall that prevented any heartfelt remorse for the result of her detrimental actions. Within seconds she had lost all respect from me, and it was sad that others telling their story had to somehow earn my respect back "“ which they thankfully did.
In addition, I have to commend director Errol Morris for his outstanding usage of photographs, letters and interviews to both explore and tell such a gripping story. From the uncomfortable vibes that a few of the soldiers gave off to the proud and at times boisterous personalities that fulfilled the screen, Morris was able to balance their presence and create a visually stimulating piece of art that is as amazing as it is haunting.
Yet, what truly astonished me about the film was its ability to counter the visuals with a strong audio presence. Tackling controversial topics in the midst of a war on terror, Morris was able to get music that fit every emotion and mood that showed itself on screen. From the daunting tone of the pictures to the heartfelt letters that were written back home, the mood was constantly changing. However, Morris was able to use the music to keep a sense of consistency, allowing the film to carry a peaceful flow that ultimately saved the film from being a cluster or wreck less havoc; instead, turning it into a bearable and at times disturbing piece of emotional art.
