Review: Chloe

Score:B+

Director:Atom Egoyan

Cast:Julianne Moore, Amanda Seyfried, Liam Neeson

Running Time:90 Minutes

Rated:R

Some may judge, others may question, but at their base, a mistress for hire is much more than what meets the eye. Take Chloe for instance, a young, provocative female who possess the charm and beauty to manipulate any man. But when the shoe is put on the other foot and she must satisfy a female client who wishes her to engage in a full-blown affair with her husband, things begin to get a little tricky.

When looking at the outer layer, Sony Pictures Classics' Chloe is nothing more than an affair gone wrong. Jealousy, rage and adulterous actions fill the screen from start to finish as the story's plotline steers straight ahead along a pre-determined path. The actions are seen from afar, and the forgone conclusion is apparent halfway through"”at least that is what director Atom Egoyan wants you to believe.

Instead of taking the generic path to normalcy, the film takes a hard swerve right, giving it an edge, complete with brutal honesty, that will send you to the front of your seat in anticipation for the next big reveal. The cinematography helps drastically in this realm of the film, as does the music "“ both of which add a mysterious layer to the already tense tone, ultimately creating a film that warrants your full attention.

Julianne Moore and Liam Neeson provide the basis for the film's recycled story, giving Amanda Seyfried's Chloe a reason to exist. And while all three prove their worth throughout the hour and a half feature, no one shocks the audience like Seyfried, who uses her mind and body to trick, mimic and tease her counterparts.

Chloe is a character-centered film that deals with the intimacy and emotional struggles of sex and lust. Luckily, all three actors envisioned their character's actions as an intoxicating way to get what they want, leaving little to the imagination in the process.

I will harp on the final moments, ones that are built up but never quite deliver as expected. The final confrontation leaves much to be desired, and is actually over before one can fully process what they are currently watching. Maybe I expected too much from the otherwise intriguing picture, but a small catfight would have left me with a smile. As it is, I sit here smirking, knowing that I enjoyed Chloe and all her assets, but realizing that, in truth, the film could have been so much more.

Seyfried does use her role to further diversify her still youthful career, and both Neeson and Moore give the film a sophisticated feel, teaching you that there are always consequences for acting a bit "˜friendly.'

Facebooktwitterredditmail

About Stephen Davis

Stephen Davis
I owe this hobby/career to the one and only Stephanie Peterman who, while interning at Fox, told me that I had too many opinions and irrelevant information to keep it all bottled up inside. I survived my first rated R film, Alive, at the ripe age of 8, it took me months to grasp the fact that Julia Roberts actually died at the end of Steel Magnolias, and I might be the only person alive who actually enjoyed Sorority Row…for its comedic value of course. While my friends can drink you under the table, I can outwatch you when it comes iconic, yet horrid 80s films like Adventures in Babysitting and Troop Beverly Hills. I have no shame when it comes to what I like, and if you have a problem with that, then we’ll settle it on the racquetball court. I see too many movies to actually win any film trivia contest, so don’t waste your first pick on me. My friends rent movies from my bookcase shelves, and one day I do plan to start charging. I long to live in LA, where my movie obsession will actually help me fit in, but for now I am content with my home in Austin. I prefer indies to blockbusters, Longhorns to Sooners and Halloween to Friday the 13th. I miss the classics, as well as John Ritter, and I hope to one day sit down and interview the amazing Kate Winslet.

Leave a Reply