Review: Misper | DIFF 2026

Score: B

Director: Harry Sherriff

Cast: Samuel Blenkin, Emily Carey, Daniel Ryan, Oliver Ryan

Running Time: 73 Minutes

Rated: NR

Misper may not be a great movie, but it's exactly the kind of movie you're happy to see at a festival. It's a new filmmaker with talent who directs a cast of performers you likely haven't seen before in a memorable story.

The film's title comes from a slang police term for "missing person." The misper in this case is Elle (Emily Carey), an employee of the barely functional Grand Hotel in the south of England. As her story becomes a local and national sensation, her co-worker Leonard (Samuel Blenkin), slowly starts unraveling. Though they worked together for nearly two years, they never spoke too much, but had a friendly relationship bordering on flirtatious.

Leonard grows frustrated that his crush has become an object of fascination, but he never really got to know her either. It doesn't help that his nightmares are filled with ghostly visions of her and what happened after she left work that night. But the mystery itself resolves fairly quickly, and we're left to examine the psychological fallout for Leonard and his co-workers.

It's pretty heavy stuff. But believe it or not, Misper is mostly a comedy. It's rarely laugh-out-loud funny. It's more of that offbeat British sense of humor, with director Harry Sherriff letting awkward silences linger. These dual tones – cringey workplace comedy and haunting psychological thriller – is what keeps the movie from being better. On their own, both parts are fine. But it doesn't completely mesh. You don't necessarily feel tonal whiplash, but its inability to commit to one or the other dulls its potential impact.

Still, Sherriff shows real skill behind the camera, especially during some of those extended dream/nightmare sequences. He's got a great full-on horror movie in him, if he ever decides to follow that path. For now, Misper serves as a mildly impressive calling card.

Facebooktwitterredditmail

About Kip Mooney

Like many film critics born during and after the 1980s, my hero is Roger Ebert. The man was already the best critic in the nation when he won the Pulitzer in 1975, but his indomitable spirit during and after his recent battle with cancer keeps me coming back to read not only his reviews but his insightful commentary on the everyday. But enough about a guy you know a lot about. I knew I was going to be a film critic—some would say a snob—in middle school, when I had to voraciously defend my position that The Royal Tenenbaums was only a million times better than Adam Sandler’s remake of Mr. Deeds. From then on, I would seek out Wes Anderson’s films and avoid Sandler’s like the plague. Still, I like to think of myself as a populist, and I’ll be just as likely to see the next superhero movie as the next Sundance sensation. The thing I most deplore in a movie is laziness. I’d much rather see movies with big ambitions try and fail than movies with no ambitions succeed at simply existing. I’m also a big advocate of fun-bad movies like The Room and most of Nicolas Cage’s work. In the past, I’ve written for The Dallas Morning News and the North Texas Daily, which I edited for a semester. I also contributed to Dallas-based Pegasus News, which in the circle of life, is now part of The Dallas Morning News, where I got my big break in 2007. Eventually, I’d love to write and talk about film full-time, but until that’s a viable career option, I work as an auditor for Wells Fargo. I hope to one day meet my hero, go to the Toronto International Film Festival, and compete on Jeopardy. Until then, I’m excited to share my love of film with you.