In 2000, Shrek hit theaters and became an overnight sensation. Mixing childhood innocence with adult humor, the film appealed to everyone, earning hundreds of millions of dollars at the box office and prompting two highly successful sequels. But like all good things, this franchise was bound to come to an end. And although there are a few spin-off films in the works, this year's Shrek Forever After is said to be the final chapter in this game-changing saga. All I can say is, it is time.
For four films now, the entire cast and crew have stuck with DreamWorks as they rode this money-making series to the bank. Mike Myers, Eddie Murphy and Cameron Diaz have been along for the ride since the series' inaugural debut, with Antonio Banderas making his third appearance as the adorable, and somewhat overweight Puss in Boots. But further down the line, we have Julie Andrews, John Cleese and many others who continue to reprise their supporting, and often times very minimal roles. It isn't a huge feat, since the film only requires they use their voices, but it is something definitely worth noting.
As for this film, I wasn't so impressed.
Let me start off by saying this: Shrek was amazing. Shrek 2, even more so. Shrek the Third, not so much. Shrek Forever After"¦ somewhere in the middle. It goes without saying that none of the films were absolutely horrible; rather, the third and now forth films just didn't necessarily live up to the expectations set by the original two.
In Round 4, we get to see Shrek and his wife Fiona adapting to the hectic life of parenthood. A new intro shows us what was happening in the land of Far Far Away just prior to Shrek rescuing his "˜true-love' in the original movie, ultimately introducing us to the villains Rupelstiltskin. Back in present time, a series of circumstances leads our adorable Shrek to sign a deal with the smooth-talking Rupelstiltskin, giving him one day of his life. But with Rupel, there is always a catch. And like most films of its kind, Shrek must now race against the clock to right all his wrongs and return Far Far Away to its rightful owner.
Sound predictable? Don't worry, it is. And sadly, that is what makes Shrek Forever After a bit of a disappointment. The unique dialogue and witty adult humor is still present (though in a much smaller quantity); however, the fluid mix and clever story is nowhere to be found. I loved the introduction of Rupelstiltskin, and Walt Dohm does a brilliant job of bringing him to life, but there just seemed to be something missing- most noticeably the "˜fairy tail' references.
Sure there were a few references scattered within the near 90 minute film, but the series' writers seem to be running low on dry, witty humor, resorting instead to slapstick and situational puns. It works most of the time, but when it is off, it makes for a strong reminder that this isn't the Shrek we fell in love with.
As a kid's movie Shrek Forever After works. But in terms of overall audience appeal, it doesn't posses the style and energy of the originals. I would recommend you consider seeing it, especially if you are a fan of 3-D. However, go in with mediocre expectations "“ it is the only way you will exit fully satisfied with what you have seen. This is said to be the "˜Final Chapter' in the series. For the sake of its credibility, I hope that DreamWorks keeps their promise.
