Review: Dog Man

Score: C+

Director: Peter Hastings

Cast: Pete Davidson, Lil Rel Howery, Isla Fisher, Ricky Gervais

Running Time: 89 Minutes

Rated: PG

There's something to be said for a squeaky clean film aimed at kids under 10. They need entertainment, too, after all. But when the quality has improved all around it, "just fine" is not good enough. Compared to the Oscar-nominated likes of Flow and the new Wallace & Gromit movie, Dog Man is ruff.

A spin-off of Dav Pilkey's Captain Underpants series, Dog Man curiously has the same plot as RoboCop, only with the police officer fused with his beloved dog instead of metal and computers. His arch-nemesis is Petey, an evil genius inventor (voiced by Pete Davidson). In attempting to wreak maximum havoc, Petey clones himself, but ends up with a mini-me instead of a full-sized villain. This of course leads the film to go sentimental at every turn, as Petey reluctantly becomes a father figure.

Dog Man stays true to its source material, in that much of the humor feels like it was written by a 6-year-old. That's not an insult. Many of the gags, while not uproarious, are decently humorous. If this movie was your kid's art, you'd hang it on the fridge, while knowing it's nothing special. But the animation can occasionally be off-putting. It's CG, but attempts to replicate stop-motion, and sometimes it can produce a jarring effect.

Ultimately, Dog Man is not bad. It's not terrible. It's just mediocre. Even in a theater full of children and their parents, there were more "awwww"s when Dog Man or Li'l Petey were in danger than there were laughs. It's not even 90 minutes long, so parents won't feel exhausted. But it's not worth piling in the minivan and spending current ticket prices on this when there are much better animal-centric options to enjoy.

Facebooktwitterredditmail

About Kip Mooney

Like many film critics born during and after the 1980s, my hero is Roger Ebert. The man was already the best critic in the nation when he won the Pulitzer in 1975, but his indomitable spirit during and after his recent battle with cancer keeps me coming back to read not only his reviews but his insightful commentary on the everyday. But enough about a guy you know a lot about. I knew I was going to be a film critic—some would say a snob—in middle school, when I had to voraciously defend my position that The Royal Tenenbaums was only a million times better than Adam Sandler’s remake of Mr. Deeds. From then on, I would seek out Wes Anderson’s films and avoid Sandler’s like the plague. Still, I like to think of myself as a populist, and I’ll be just as likely to see the next superhero movie as the next Sundance sensation. The thing I most deplore in a movie is laziness. I’d much rather see movies with big ambitions try and fail than movies with no ambitions succeed at simply existing. I’m also a big advocate of fun-bad movies like The Room and most of Nicolas Cage’s work. In the past, I’ve written for The Dallas Morning News and the North Texas Daily, which I edited for a semester. I also contributed to Dallas-based Pegasus News, which in the circle of life, is now part of The Dallas Morning News, where I got my big break in 2007. Eventually, I’d love to write and talk about film full-time, but until that’s a viable career option, I work as an auditor for Wells Fargo. I hope to one day meet my hero, go to the Toronto International Film Festival, and compete on Jeopardy. Until then, I’m excited to share my love of film with you.